DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Citroen C2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C2
MGMakeCitroen
ZRModelC2
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C2
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
179 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
103 HPPower68 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank41 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationCitroen C2
4011 mmLength3666 mm
1690 mmWidth1659 mm
1400 mmHeight1474 mm
1060 KgWeight996 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…