2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Citroen C2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
C2
Citroen C2 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C2
RoverMakeCitroen
25ModelC2
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C2
10,2 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
180 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
103 HPPower68 HP
123 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank41 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C2
3990 mmLength3666 mm
1688 mmWidth1659 mm
1417 mmHeight1474 mm
1105 KgWeight996 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2315 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…