2003 • Citroen
C2
Citroen C2 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Citroen C2 vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen C2SpecificationMG ZR
CitroenMakeMG
C2ModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Citroen C2SpecificationMG ZR
14,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
166 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower103 HP
150 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen C2SpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen C2SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen C2SpecificationMG ZR
3666 mmLength4011 mm
1659 mmWidth1690 mm
1474 mmHeight1400 mm
996 KgWeight1060 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen C2 and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…