DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Cadillac STS vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeChrysler
STSModelConcorde
2004Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
229 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
258 HPPower258 HP
346 NmTorque348 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
17,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4985 mmLength5310 mm
1843 mmWidth1890 mm
1464 mmHeight1435 mm
1782 KgWeight1690 Kg
2957 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Cadillac STS and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…