DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler 300 vs 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeOldsmobile
300ModelAurora
2004Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
219 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3473 cc
249 HPPower218 HP
250 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength5060 mm
1881 mmWidth1850 mm
1481 mmHeight1440 mm
1746 KgWeight1645 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler 300 and 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…