DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora vs 2004 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeChrysler
AuroraModel300
2003Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3473 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
218 HPPower249 HP
312 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5060 mmLength4999 mm
1850 mmWidth1881 mm
1440 mmHeight1481 mm
1645 KgWeight1746 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Oldsmobile Aurora and 2004 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…