DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Murano vs 2004 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler 300

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChrysler
MuranoModel300
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
248 HPPower249 HP
333 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
235/65 R18Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4999 mm
1880 mmWidth1881 mm
1690 mmHeight1481 mm
1588 KgWeight1746 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Murano and 2004 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler 300 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…