DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo 4C vs 2016 Audi Q7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

85.5–85.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAudi
4CModelQ7
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
258 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower252 HP
350 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears8 Tiptronic
205/45 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size255/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3989 mmLength5052 mm
1864 mmWidth1968 mm
1183 mmHeight1741 mm
895 KgWeight1910 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2994 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo 4C and 2016 Audi Q7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…