DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jaguar XF vs 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

85.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
XFModel4C
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
241 km/hTop speed258 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
365 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears—
245/45 R18Tyre size205/45 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4955 mmLength3989 mm
1987 mmWidth1864 mm
1496 mmHeight1183 mm
1705 KgWeight895 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jaguar XF and 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…