DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q7 vs 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

85.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeAlfa Romeo
Q7Model4C
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
233 km/hTop speed258 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
252 HPPower240 HP
370 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 TiptronicGears—
255/60 R18Tyre size205/45 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength3989 mm
1968 mmWidth1864 mm
1741 mmHeight1183 mm
1910 KgWeight895 Kg
2994 mmWheelbase2380 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q7 and 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…