2016 • Alfa Romeo
4C
Alfa Romeo 4C 1.7 (240 Hp) 2016Overall Score85.5/100
2016 Alfa Romeo 4C vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Jaguar
XF
Jaguar XF 2.0 (250 Hp) 2016Overall Score85.75/100
WINNER
Jaguar XF
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
85.5–85.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 4CSpecificationJaguar XF
Alfa RomeoMakeJaguar
4CModelXF
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 4CSpecificationJaguar XF
4,5 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
258 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
350 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 4CSpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank74 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 4CSpecificationJaguar XF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears8
205/45 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 4CSpecificationJaguar XF
3989 mmLength4955 mm
1864 mmWidth1987 mm
1183 mmHeight1496 mm
895 KgWeight1705 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2960 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Alfa Romeo 4C and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…