DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Trax vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
TraxModelASX
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
186 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
130 HPPower140 HP
300 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsCVT
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4248 mmLength4295 mm
1776 mmWidth1770 mm
1674 mmHeight1625 mm
1384 KgWeight1390 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Trax and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…