DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Chevrolet Trax Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trax

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeChevrolet
MeganeModelTrax
2016Model year2016
Coupe - CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
205 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
130 HPPower130 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4485 mmLength4248 mm
1811 mmWidth1776 mm
1434 mmHeight1674 mm
1621 KgWeight1384 Kg
2609 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trax leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…