DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2002 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
TrackerModelC70
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
160 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
167 HPPower200 HP
220 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4059 mmLength4716 mm
1694 mmWidth1817 mm
1689 mmHeight1429 mm
1335 KgWeight1570 Kg
2479 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 2002 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…