2002 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.5 i (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Mazda Capella vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.5 i V6 (167 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
MazdaMakeChevrolet
CapellaModelTracker
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
200 HPPower167 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4665 mmLength4059 mm
1965 mmWidth1694 mm
1510 mmHeight1689 mm
1320 KgWeight1335 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2479 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Capella and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…