DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Verossa vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeChevrolet
VerossaModelTracker
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
200 HPPower167 HP
250 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/45 R17Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4059 mm
1760 mmWidth1694 mm
1450 mmHeight1689 mm
1490 KgWeight1335 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2479 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Verossa and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…