DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2002 Ford Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
TrackerModelCougar
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
160 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
167 HPPower205 HP
220 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4059 mmLength4700 mm
1694 mmWidth1780 mm
1689 mmHeight1340 mm
1335 KgWeight1390 Kg
2479 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 2002 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…