DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSuzuki
TrackerModelGrand Vitara
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

150 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
122 HPPower92 HP
182 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption10 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength3810 mm
1694 mmWidth1700 mm
1689 mmHeight1690 mm
1210 KgWeight1200 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Tracker and 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…