2003 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 IDE 16V (140 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Renault Laguna vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 2.0 i 16V (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault LagunaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
RenaultMakeChevrolet
LagunaModelTracker
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Renault LagunaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
140 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault LagunaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault LagunaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault LagunaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4575 mmLength3780 mm
1772 mmWidth1694 mm
1429 mmHeight1689 mm
1300 KgWeight1210 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Renault Laguna and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…