DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChevrolet
FreelanderModelTracker
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
112 HPPower122 HP
260 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3780 mm
1809 mmWidth1694 mm
1708 mmHeight1689 mm
1565 KgWeight1210 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…