DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2002 Opel Meriva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Meriva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
TrackerModelMeriva
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,4 s
150 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
97 HPPower100 HP
133 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank53 lt
14 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4042 mm
1630 mmWidth1694 mm
1650 mmHeight1624 mm
1235 KgWeight1455 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 2002 Opel Meriva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Meriva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…