DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChevrolet
ADModelTracker
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
132 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4370 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1475 mmHeight1650 mm
—Weight1235 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…