2002 • Daihatsu
Pyzar
Daihatsu Pyzar 1.5 i (100 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Daihatsu Pyzar vs 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Daihatsu Pyzar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DaihatsuMakeChevrolet
PyzarModelTracker
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1495 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
128 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4050 mmLength3650 mm
1640 mmWidth1630 mm
1620 mmHeight1650 mm
1080 KgWeight1235 Kg
2395 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Daihatsu Pyzar and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daihatsu Pyzar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…