DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2010 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeJeep
CaptivaModelCommander
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5/7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
204 km/hTop speed191 km/h
3195 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
230 HPPower218 HP
308 NmTorque510 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank78 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/55 R18Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4787 mm
1850-1870 mmWidth1900 mm
1720-1755 mmHeight1826 mm
1770/1805 KgWeight2245 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chevrolet Captiva and 2010 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…