DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Jeep Commander vs 2010 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeChevrolet
CommanderModelCaptiva
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
191 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3195 cc
218 HPPower230 HP
510 NmTorque308 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption16,2 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/65R17Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4635 mm
1900 mmWidth1850-1870 mm
1826 mmHeight1720-1755 mm
2245 KgWeight1770/1805 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Jeep Commander and 2010 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…