DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2016 Ford Edge Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Edge

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.

78.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
CaptivaModelEdge
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
258 HPPower280 HP
288 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/55 R18Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4778 mm
1849 mmWidth1928 mm
1727 mmHeight1742 mm
—Weight1774 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Captiva and 2016 Ford Edge approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Edge leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…