DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Renault Laguna vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeChevrolet
LagunaModelCaptiva
2015Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
242 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
235 HPPower258 HP
450 NmTorque288 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/50 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4673 mm
1812 mmWidth1849 mm
1398 mmHeight1727 mm
1630 KgWeight—
2694 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Renault Laguna and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…