DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMitsubishi
CaptivaModelL 200
2015Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
190 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
167 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength5185 mm
1849 mmWidth1750 mm
1756 mmHeight1775 mm
—Weight1870 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Chevrolet Captiva and 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…