DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2015 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
L 200ModelCaptiva
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
167 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
136 HPPower167 HP
314 NmTorque230 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4673 mm
1750 mmWidth1849 mm
1775 mmHeight1756 mm
1870 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2015 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…