DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2014 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeKia
CaptivaModelOptima
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
190 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
167 HPPower165 HP
230 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17 HTyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4845 mm
1849-1868 mmWidth1830 mm
1756 mmHeight1455 mm
1693/1718 KgWeight1500 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Chevrolet Captiva and 2014 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…