DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Optima vs 2014 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelCaptiva
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
165 HPPower167 HP
196 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size235/60 R17 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4673 mm
1830 mmWidth1849-1868 mm
1455 mmHeight1756 mm
1500 KgWeight1693/1718 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Optima and 2014 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…