DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2016 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
CaptivaModelAntara
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
184 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank65 lt
10 ltUrban consumption10,0 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4596 mm
1849 mmWidth1850 mm
1756 mmHeight1717 mm
—Weight1967 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Captiva and 2016 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…