DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs 2016 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeChevrolet
GiuliaModelCaptiva
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
230 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
180 HPPower184 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption10 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4673 mm
1860 mmWidth1849 mm
1436 mmHeight1756 mm
1374 KgWeight—
2820 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia and 2016 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…