DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAlfa Romeo
CaptivaModelGiulia
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
192 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
184 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank52 lt
10 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4643 mm
1849 mmWidth1860 mm
1756 mmHeight1436 mm
—Weight1374 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Chevrolet Captiva and 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…