DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2012 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAudi
CaptivaModelQ3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed212 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
184 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/60 R17; 235/50 R19Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4385 mm
1868-1849 mmWidth1831 mm
1756 mmHeight1608 mm
1878 KgWeight1585 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Captiva and 2012 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…