DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi Q3 vs 2012 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChevrolet
Q3ModelCaptiva
2012Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
212 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
170 HPPower184 HP
280 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/50 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4673 mm
1831 mmWidth1868-1849 mm
1608 mmHeight1756 mm
1585 KgWeight1878 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi Q3 and 2012 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…