DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2012 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeLand Rover
CaptivaModelFreelander
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
184 HPPower150 HP
400 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17; 235/50 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4500 mm
1868-1849 mmWidth—
1756 mmHeight1740 mm
1878 KgWeight1710 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Chevrolet Captiva and 2012 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…