DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CaptivaModelC30
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeCoupe
5/7Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4266 mm
1850-1870 mmWidth1782 mm
1720-1755 mmHeight1447 mm
1770/1820 KgWeight1450 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Chevrolet Captiva and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…