DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
C30ModelCaptiva
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
3Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4635 mm
1782 mmWidth1850-1870 mm
1447 mmHeight1720-1755 mm
1450 KgWeight1770/1820 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…