DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2006 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolkswagen
CaptivaModelEos
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
184 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4407 mm
1850-1870 mmWidth1791 mm
1720-1755 mmHeight1443 mm
1770/1820 KgWeight1548 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chevrolet Captiva and 2006 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…