DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volkswagen Eos vs 2006 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeChevrolet
EosModelCaptiva
2006Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
206 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4407 mmLength4635 mm
1791 mmWidth1850-1870 mm
1443 mmHeight1720-1755 mm
1548 KgWeight1770/1820 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volkswagen Eos and 2006 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…