DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2005 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Camaro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeHolden
CamaroModelCommodore
2002Model year2005
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

5,2 s0–100 km/h—
257 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
329 HPPower320 HP
468 NmTorque464 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
9,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/50 R16Tyre size235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4907 mmLength4891 mm
1882 mmWidth1842 mm
1303 mmHeight1425 mm
1605 KgWeight1615 Kg
2568 mmWheelbase2788 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Camaro and 2005 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…