DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Commodore vs 2002 Chevrolet Camaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Camaro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeChevrolet
CommodoreModelCamaro
2005Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,2 s
0 km/hTop speed257 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
320 HPPower329 HP
464 NmTorque468 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
13 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,9 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/40 R18Tyre size245/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4891 mmLength4907 mm
1842 mmWidth1882 mm
1425 mmHeight1303 mm
1615 KgWeight1605 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2568 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Commodore and 2002 Chevrolet Camaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Camaro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…