DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Acura CSX vs 2006 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura CSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura CSXSpecificationKia Optima
AcuraMakeKia
CSXModelOptima
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura CSXSpecificationKia Optima
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
157 HPPower140 HP
188 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura CSXSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura CSXSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura CSXSpecificationKia Optima
4544 mmLength4735 mm
1752 mmWidth1805 mm
1435 mmHeight1480 mm
1290 KgWeight1525 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Acura CSX and 2006 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura CSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…