DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Optima vs 2006 Acura CSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura CSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
KiaMakeAcura
OptimaModelCSX
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower157 HP
305 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura CSX
4735 mmLength4544 mm
1805 mmWidth1752 mm
1480 mmHeight1435 mm
1525 KgWeight1290 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Optima and 2006 Acura CSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura CSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…