DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Alphard vs 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
AlphardModel166
2004Model year2005
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed241 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
220 HPPower220 HP
304 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption18,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4720 mm
1830 mmWidth1815 mm
1935 mmHeight1406 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Alphard and 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…