DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Chevrolet Astro vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
AstroModelExplorer
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
176 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4293 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
163 HPPower162 HP
319 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,4 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/70 R15 TTyre size225/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4761 mmLength4530 mm
1969 mmWidth1790 mm
1940 mmHeight1800 mm
1971 KgWeight1670 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Chevrolet Astro and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…