DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Explorer vs 1999 Chevrolet Astro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
ExplorerModelAstro
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed176 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4293 cc
162 HPPower163 HP
305 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank102 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
10,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/75 R15Tyre size205/70 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4761 mm
1790 mmWidth1969 mm
1800 mmHeight1940 mm
1670 KgWeight1971 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Explorer and 1999 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…