DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2003 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
166ModelS60
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
150 HPPower200 HP
305 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption15 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4576 mm
1815 mmWidth1804 mm
1416 mmHeight1428 mm
1490 KgWeight1440 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2003 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…