DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo S60 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
S60Model166
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
200 HPPower150 HP
285 NmTorque305 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
15 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4576 mmLength4720 mm
1804 mmWidth1815 mm
1428 mmHeight1416 mm
1440 KgWeight1490 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo S60 and 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…